01 / Intake
Not every change deserves the same review path.
Start with the changed surface: scope, ownership, sensitive files, and the places where broad or generated work needs more care.
Reviews Are Changing
A Neuve way to think about reviews.
Software review should be more than a queue of comments. Neuve is shaping a calmer, evidence-led system for understanding changes, risks, and the engineering judgment behind them.
A calmer review loop for code that looks ready before it is proven.
Neuve is a small preview of a larger idea: review should behave less like a comment queue and more like evidence-led intake for engineering judgment.
02 / Context
Review should carry its source of truth with it.
Connect code changes to the docs, history, usage, decisions, and missing context that explain what correctness should mean.
03 / Proof
Confidence should come after evidence.
Separate what is covered by checks from what still needs human judgment, verification, decomposition, or a clearer owner decision.
Early thinking, shaped by local-first review artifacts, source-context maps, and verifier-first workflow research.